Criminal Law and Procedure Decisions: Atwater v. City of Lago Vista</titl <body>  <script language="javascript1.1" src="http://images.findlaw.com/tracking/wss-lp.js"></script> <script language="javascript1.1" src="http://images.findlaw.com/tracking/hbx-0250.js"></script> <noscript> <img src="http://ehg-findlaw.hitbox.com/HG?hc=we76&cd=1&hv=6&ce=u&hb=DM531216MLSZ&n=LP&vcon=NO+JAVASCRIPT&vpc=HBX0250u" border="0" width="1" height="1"> </noscript>  <div id="main"> <div id="doc3" class="pro"> <div id="bd"> <div class="yui-g" id="header"> <div id="header_sub_center"> <h1 id="logo"><a href="http://lp.findlaw.com"><b>FindLaw | Find a Lawyer. Find Answers.</b></a></h1> <div id="question"> <h3><a href="http://www.findlaw.com/" class="c_4">Non-Professional? Visit our consumer site »</a></h3> <div class="c_4"><a href='http://login.findlaw.com/scripts/register?dest=http://sol.lp.findlaw.com/2000/atwater.html'>Register</a> or <a href='http://login.findlaw.com/scripts/login?dest=http://sol.lp.findlaw.com/2000/atwater.html'>Log-In</a><br/></div> </div>  <div id="primary_nav"> <ul> <li><a href="http://www.findlaw.com/casecode/" class="research research_selected">Research the Law</a></li> <li><a href="http://lp.findlaw.com/law-practice-management/" class="practice">Manage Your Practice</a></li> <li><a href="http://lp.findlaw.com/law-career-and-education/" class="career">Manage Your Career</a></li> <li><a href="http://news.lp.findlaw.com/" class="newscommentary">News & Commentary</a></li> <li class="last"><a href="http://marketcenter.findlaw.com/" class="marketcenter">Market Center</a></li> </ul> </div>  </div> </div> <div class="yui-g" id="main_ctnt"> <div id="main_child"> <div id="main_ctnt_center_top" class="yui-g shareright"> <div id="search_box"> <form id="search" action="http://lawcrawler.findlaw.com/scripts/lc.pl" method="GET"> <input TYPE=hidden NAME="sites" value="pro"> <input id="search_txt" class="dark_g" type="text" name="entry" value="Search FindLaw" onfocus="this.value = '';"/> <a id="search_btn" href="#" onclick="document.forms.search.submit();">Search</a> </form> </div>  </div> <div id="main_ctnt_center_mid" class="yui-g">  <div class="bread_crum"> <ul id="bc_nav"> <li class="bc_link"><a href="#" class="nav_hd"><span>Research the Law</span></a> <ul class="bc_ctnt" id="bc1_box"> <li> <div class="line"></div> <div class="issues individual"> <h4>Primary Materials</h4> <ul> <li><a href="http://guide.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/">Cases & Codes</a></li> <li><a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casesummary/index.html">Opinion Summaries</a></li> <li><a href="http://forms.lp.findlaw.com/">Forms & Contracts</a></li> <li><a href="http://library.findlaw.com/">Law Articles</a></li> </ul> <ul> <li><a href="http://guide.lp.findlaw.com/01topics/">Practice Areas</a></li> <li><a href="http://guide.lp.findlaw.com/11stategov/">Jurisdictions</a></li> <li><a href="http://westlegaledcenter.findlaw.com/home/homepage.jsf?sc_cid=Findlawclecntrtab">CLE</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.findlaw.com/toc.html">View all »</a></li> </ul> </div> <div class="issues individual"> <h4>Resource Centers</h4> <ul> <li><a href="http://technology.findlaw.com/">Law Technology</a></li> <li><a href="http://practice.findlaw.com/">Practice Management</a></li> <li><a href="http://corporate.findlaw.com/">Corporate Counsel</a></li> <li><a href="http://stu.findlaw.com/">Law Students</a></li> </ul> <ul> <li><a href="http://marketcenter.findlaw.com/">Market Center</a></li> <li><a href="http://legalrecords.findlaw.com/">Thomson Legal Record</a></li> <li><a href="http://careers.findlaw.com/">Legal Careers</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.lawyermarketing.com/">Lawyer Marketing</a></li> </ul> </div> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="bc_link limit"></li> </ul> </div>  <div id="main_ctnt_center_mid" class="yui-g narrow">  <div id="sub_ctnt" class="yui-g home"> <div class="yui-g home_mid_ctnt"> <div class="yui-g ad_interior_top"> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">top728();</script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">pop_under();</script></div>   <div class="yui-g intro"> <h1 class="c_1">Criminal Law Summaries</h1> <hr /> <div id="textbox"><h5><a href="http://www.findlaw.com">FindLaw</a> > <a href="../index.html">Criminal Law Summaries</a> > Atwater v. City of Lago Vista</h5><P align="center"><b>Fourth Amendment – Warrantless Misdemeanor Arrests</b></p><p><b>Case: <a href="http://laws.findlaw.com/us/000/99-1408.html">Atwater v. City of Lago Vista</a></b></p><p><b>Issue</b>: Whether the Fourth Amendment prohibits “a warrantless arrest for a minor criminal offense, such as a misdemeanor seatbelt violation punishable only by a fine.”</p><p><b>Facts</b>: In Texas, violation of the seatbelt laws is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not less than $25 or more than $50. Texas law also authorizes (but does not require) police to arrest a person found violating the seatbelt laws. In March 1997, Petitioner Gail Atwater was driving her pickup truck in Lago Vista with her two children; neither Atwater nor her children were wearing a seatbelt. Respondent Bart Turek, a police officer for Respondent Lago Vista, observed the seatbelt violations and pulled over Atwater’s truck. Turek approached the truck in a belligerent manner shouting at Atwater. When Atwater asked him to lower his voice, because he was frightening her children, Turek yelled that Atwater was going to jail. Turek then called for backup and asked to see Atwater’s driver’s license and insurance papers, which Texas law required her to carry. Atwater did not have these papers, claiming that her purse had recently been stolen. Atwater was arrested and brought to the local police station. There, booking officers had her remove her shoes, jewelry, and eyeglasses, and empty her pockets. Police took a mug shot of Atwater and placed her in a jail cell for one hour, after which she was taken before a magistrate and released on $310 bail. Later, Atwater was charged with violations of the seatbelt laws, driving without a license, and failure to provide proof of insurance. Atwater pled no contest to the seatbelt offense and paid a $50 fine. All other charges were dismissed.</p><p>Atwater later filed suit in Texas state court, claiming that Lago Vista and Turek had violated her Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizure. The case was removed to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, which later dismissed the case, holding that Atwater’s guilty plea, along with the absence of any allegation that she had been harmed or detained in any way inconsistent with the law, made her Fourth Amendment claims meritless. A panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed, concluding that an arrest for a first-time seat beat offense constituted an unreasonable Fourth Amendment seizure. It also held that Turek was not entitled to qualified immunity. Sitting <U>en banc</U>, the Fifth Circuit vacated the panel’s decision. Because neither party disputed Turek’s probable cause to arrest Atwater and because there was no evidence that he acted in an extraordinary manner, the arrest was not unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment.</p><p><b>Holding</b>: “[T]he standard of probable cause ‘applie[s] to all arrests, without the need to balance the interests and circumstances involved in particular situations.’ . . . If an officer has probable cause to believe that an individual has committed even a very minor criminal offense in his presence, he may without violating the Fourth Amendment, arrest the offender.”</p><p><b>Reasoning</b>: The Fourth Amendment provides in part that “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.” In interpreting the Fourth Amendment, the Court has always been guided by “the traditional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures afforded by the common law at the time of the framing.” Atwater contended that, at the time of the Constitution’s framing, the common law prohibited officers from making warrantless misdemeanor arrests, except in cases of breach of the peace, “a category she claims was then understood narrowly as covering only those non-felony offenses involving or tending toward violence.” Examining the common law record up to and including the founding era, the Court observed that, although the historical evidence was mixed, there was a decided, majority view that policemen could arrest without warrant for many misdemeanors occurring within their presence, even when the misdemeanors did not involve breaches of the peace. Justice Souter, writing for the Court, examined pre-founding and founding era cases and treatises, as well as statutes enacted by Parliament and colonial legislatures, in reaching his conclusions regarding the common law tradition. The Court also rejected Atwater’s contention that developments since the Fourth Amendment’s ratification had “woven” her suggested rule “into the fabric” of American law. “The story, on the contrary, is of two centuries of uninterrupted (and largely unchallenged) state and federal practice [judicial and statutory] permitting warrantless arrests for misdemeanors not amounting to or involving breach of the peace.” This post-ratification judicial and legislative tradition is “buttressed” by “more than a century” of legal commentary that has almost uniformly recognized the constitutionality of such warrantless arrest power. “Small wonder, then, that today statutes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia permit warrantless misdemeanor arrests by at least some (if not all) peace officers without requiring any breach of the peace, as do a host of congressional enactments.”</p><p>The Court similarly rejected Atwater’s argument for a modern Fourth Amendment rule (in light of the allegedly uncertain nature of common law history) forbidding warrantless arrest for violation of a statute when a conviction under that statute could not result in jail time <U>and</U> the government shows no compelling need for immediate detention. “[W]e have traditionally recognized that a responsible Fourth Amendment balance is not well served by standards requiring sensitive, case-by-case determinations of government need, lest every discretionary judgment in the field be converted into an occasion for constitutional review.” Citing the need for “sufficiently clear and simple” standards that could survive “judicial second-guessing,” the Court stated that a distinction between jailable and fine-only offenses would prove too burdensome. “It is not merely that we cannot expect every police officer to know the details of frequently complex penalty schemes, . . . but that penalties for ostensibly identical conduct can vary on account of facts difficult (if not impossible) to know at the scene of an arrest.” Instead, the factor to examine, as always, is whether the officer had probable cause. If an officer had probable cause that a minor criminal offense was committed in his presence, the Fourth Amendment would allow a warrantless arrest of that individual. (The Court conceded, however, that, “[i]f we were to devise a rule exclusively to address the uncontested facts of this case, Atwater might well prevail. . . . In her case, the physical incidents of arrest were merely gratuitous humiliations imposed by a police officer who was (at best) exercising extremely poor judgment. Atwater’s claim to live free of pointless indignity and confinement clearly outweighs anything the City can raise against it specific to her case.”) Because Turek had probable cause and the arrest was not made in an extraordinary manner “unusually harmful” to Atwater’s “privacy or physical interests,” there was no Fourth Amendment violation. “Turek was authorized (not required, but authorized) to make a custodial arrest without balancing costs and benefits or determining whether or not Atwater’s arrest was in some sense necessary.”</p><p><b>Other Opinions</b>: Justice O’Connor’s dissent, joined by Justices Stevens, Ginsburg, and Breyer, agreed with the majority’s conclusion that Atwater’s arrest was a “pointless indignity” that served no discernible state interest. Since Atwater’s custodial arrest was a seizure effected without a warrant, “the plain language of the Fourth Amendment requires that the arrest be reasonable.” Although common law history is often looked to in determining Fourth Amendment reasonableness, it is only one such tool. Moreover, when that history is inconclusive, the Court evaluates reasonableness by “assessing, on the one hand, the degree to which [the search or seizure] intrudes upon an individual’s privacy and, on the other, the degree to which [the search or seizure] is needed for the protection of legitimate governmental interests.” Where a state has decided that an offense is sanctionable by a fine only its interest in seizing a person suspected of committing that offense is minimal, while the actual seizure of that person represents such a severe intrusion on individual liberty that it could not be reasonable. The dissent advocated a standard under which a police officer would be permitted to make a warrantless arrest for a non-jailable offense only “if the officer is able to point to specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant” a full custodial arrest. The dissent rejected the majority’s concern about police officers’ personal liability for wrongful arrest under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and any resulting disincentive to make arrests, noting that the standard for reasonableness for a Fourth Amendment search and seizure is distinct from and more rigorous than the standard of reasonableness for purposes of qualified immunity in civil lawsuits. </p><p>Lago Vista’s argument that Atwater’s arrest served two legitimate interests (enforcement of child safety laws and encouraging Atwater’s appearance at trial), and was therefore reasonable, was flawed. With respect to child safety laws, Atwater posed no great danger to the community and a citation would have just as effectively served law enforcement goals. Indeed, the arrest was counterproductive to child welfare since it traumatized Atwater’s children. With respect to attendance at trial, Atwater, a 16-year resident of Lago Vista, was clearly no flight risk. “The majority’s assessment that ‘Atwater’s claim clearly outweighs anything the City can raise against it specific to her case’. . . is quite correct. In my view, the Fourth Amendment inquiry ends there.”</p><p><b>Comment</b>: Many commentators have expressed surprise that Justice Souter wrote the majority opinion, with its heavy emphasis on original intent. Although Souter is a strong adherent of following Supreme Court precedent in constitutional adjudication, when writing on a judicially clean slate he professes to be an originalist. This opinion leads credence to that view. Officer Turek’s conduct was offensive and outrageous, but not every outrageous governmental action violates the Constitution. The States remain free to enact statutes limiting the authority of their police officers to make warrantless custodial arrests for violations of minor misdemeanor statutes. </p></div> </div>       <div id="fl_container3"> <script language="javascript">fl_legal_645x52();</script> <script language="javascript">fl_legal_645x52();</script> <script language="javascript">fl_legal_645x52();</script> <div id="fl_label">Ads by FindLaw</div> </div> <script> hide_box('fl_container3'); </script>  </div> </div> <div class="nav_right rn_inner">  <div class="sections yui-g"> <h2 class="right" style="color:#666666;">Welcome Legal Professionals</h2> <p>FindLaw provides the resources to help you practice law. Access free cases & codes, connect with your peers, and leverage FindLaw's lawyer marketing solutions.</p> <div id="lprightcollinks"> <a href="http://www.findlaw.com/casecode/">Cases & Codes</a><br /> <a href="http://lp.findlaw.com/law-practice-management/">Practice Management</a><br /> <a href="http://www.lawyermarketing.com/">Lawyer Marketing</a><br /> <a href="http://lp.findlaw.com/law-career-and-education/">Career & Education</a><br /> <a href="http://justice-email.findlaw.com/">Justice Mail</a><br /> <a href="http://newsletters.findlaw.com/">Newsletters</a></div> </div>   <div class="sections sub_block yui-g">  <div align="center"><script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">newsSky();</script></div>  </div> </div> </div> </div> <div id="main_ctnt_center_bottom" class="yui-g home"></div>  </div> </div> </div> <div id="ft"> <div id="footer_nav" class="yui-g"> <div id="footer_nav_left_ctnt" class="yui-g"> <div class="yui-g footer_line"> <div class="first footer_title"> <h4>research the law</h4> </div> <div class="footer_list"> <ul> <li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.findlaw.com/casecode/">Cases & Codes</a> /</li> <li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casesummary/index.html">Opinion Summaries</a> /</li> <li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://contracts.corporate.findlaw.com/">Sample Business Contracts</a> /</li> <li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://legalrecords.findlaw.com/">Research an attorney or law firm</a></li> </ul> </div> </div> <div class="yui-g footer_line"> <div class="first footer_title"> <h4>manage your practice</h4> </div> <div class="footer_list"> <ul> <li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://technology.findlaw.com/">Law Technology</a> /</li> <li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://practice.findlaw.com/">Law Practice Management</a> /</li> <li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.lawyermarketing.com/">Law Firm Marketing Services</a> /</li> <li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://corporate.findlaw.com/">Corporate Counsel Center</a></li> </ul> </div> </div> <div class="yui-g footer_line"> <div class="first footer_title"> <h4>manage your career</h4> </div> <div class="footer_list"> <ul> <li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://careers.findlaw.com/">Legal Career Job Search</a> /</li> <li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://westlegaledcenter.findlaw.com/home/homepage.jsf?sc_cid=Findlawclecntrtab">Online CLE</a> /</li> <li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://stu.findlaw.com/">Law Student Resources</a></li> </ul> </div> </div> <div class="yui-g footer_line"> <div class="first footer_title"> <h4>news and commentary</h4> </div> <div class="footer_list"> <ul> <li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://news.lp.findlaw.com">Legal News Headlines</a> /</li> <li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://writ.lp.findlaw.com">Law Commentary</a> /</li> <li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://news.lp.findlaw.com/legalnews/documents/index2.html">Featured Documents</a> /</li> <li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://newsletters.findlaw.com/">Newsletters</a> /</li> <li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.findlaw.com/rss/">RSS Feeds</a></li> </ul> </div> </div> <div class="yui-g footer_line"> <div class="first footer_title"> <h4>Get Legal Forms</h4> </div> <div class="footer_list"> <ul> <li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://forms.findlaw.com">Legal Forms for Your Practice</a></li> </ul> </div> </div> <div class="yui-g footer_line"> <div class="first footer_title"> <h4>about us</h4> </div> <div class="footer_list"> <ul> <li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://company.findlaw.com/company_info.html">Company History</a> /</li> <li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://company.findlaw.com/media_relations.html">Media Relations</a> /</li> <li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://company.findlaw.com/contacts.html">Contact Us</a> /</li> <li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://company.findlaw.com/adkit/index.html">Advertising</a> /</li> <li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://company.findlaw.com/jobs/">Jobs</a></li> </ul> </div> </div> <div id="copy_awards" class="yui-g"> <hr /> <div id="copyright">Copyright © 2008 FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business. All rights reserved. </div> <div id="ft_awards"> <span>Webby Awards</span> <span>Time 50 coolest websites</span> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </body> </html>